Pushing the Boundaries with R&Sie(n)

Published by
jesse
May 6, 2011

Francois Roche and Stephanie Lavaux of R&Sie(n) speak to Ola Bednarczuk about complexity, conflict and the importance of pushing the boundaries of architecture.

The largely conceptual work of French architectural practice R&Sie(n) – pronounced ’heresy’ and led by architect François Roche and artist Stéphanie Lavaux – challenges modern conventions of design and building.

Story continues below advertisement

“International design is a catastrophe,” says Roche, who blames the capitalist model for encouraging a standardised mode of architecture “bringing the same ideology to everywhere on the planet,” creating a homogenous built environment with the delusion of being unique.

“Architects need to renovate the notion of resistance,” Roche says.

“How can we be at the same time in the system, and denounce the system? We have to re-embrace the ambiguity and complexity of the world. Architecture is ideal to do that. Not to deny or to simplify, but to articulate conflict.”

Story continues below advertisement

R&Sie(n) strive to achieve this through their projects.

“We work in the ambiguity between where we come from and where we want to go,” says Lavaux.

Story continues below advertisement

 

Their Isobiot®ope installation, part of a laboratory and research centre for lighting company Zumtobel, explores the danger of nature by using uranium pigments to measure the intensity of UV rays.

 

“Uranium pigment is very sensitive to the intensity of the UV crossing the stratosphere,” Roche explains.

“We are using uranium to create danger. There is paranoia of danger from the bomb, and from nuclear power stations, and at the same time it’s a substance that visibly indicates the degree of danger for the future. So [our project] indicates the paranoia of yesterday created by science and the dangerousness of tomorrow.

“I love this kind of ambiguity, this ambivalence. I think architecture has to reveal this ambiguity. Normally architects are commissioned where there is no more conflict, where it has already been erased. This is an incredible paradox.”

 

Roche is optimistic about the possibility of change in approach to the current system by modern architects.

“For the first time in a long time architects have in front of them the apparatus and tooling which could help them to approach complexity,” he says.

“It doesn’t mean that everyone will use this kind of potentiality of course, but it’s temptation. You cannot resist this kind of temptation. It’s linked with desire.”

Photos by Alessio Erioli

R&Sie(n)
new-territories.com